Seizure · 2023
Safety & feasibility of responsive neurostimulation in children with refractory epilepsy: A single-center experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Enner Stephanie, El-Hallal Maria, Hogan Katherine, Rodgers Shaun, Karkare Shefali, Kothare Sanjeev
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a relatively recent addition to the epilepsy surgery armory, gaining FDA approval in 2013 for use in adults with intractable focal epilepsy. Data for the use of RNS system in patients less than 18 years of age is limited. We aim to determine the safety and feasibility of RNS in children with refractory epilepsy.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent RNS implantation at an urban tertiary children's hospital. Demographics of the patients were obtained, including age at the time of implant, MRI findings, seizure onset zone identification, and RNS targets.
RESULTS: Out of a fourteen patient cohort, one patient had a post-operative complication of infection at surgical site requiring explantation. Thirteen out of 14 patients had immediate post-operative head imaging that was negative for hemorrhage, infarction, or skull fracture; one patient did not undergo head imaging. No patients reported a worsening clinical seizure frequency at a 6-month follow up visit. In the subset of patients who were implanted with RNS and did not undergo concurrent resections, there was a statistically significant reduction in the average number of long episodes at the most recent visit when compared to the 1-month post-operative visit (p = 0.0268).
CONCLUSIONS: RNS is a feasible and safe option for children as young as six years with refractory epilepsy when appropriate seizure focus identification has been performed with stereo CT and stereo EEG evaluations, and can be used in conjunction with other surgical epilepsy treatment modalities. Two canister RNS placement is achievable for patients with a broad epileptogenic network or multifocal seizure onset zones.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent RNS implantation at an urban tertiary children's hospital. Demographics of the patients were obtained, including age at the time of implant, MRI findings, seizure onset zone identification, and RNS targets.
RESULTS: Out of a fourteen patient cohort, one patient had a post-operative complication of infection at surgical site requiring explantation. Thirteen out of 14 patients had immediate post-operative head imaging that was negative for hemorrhage, infarction, or skull fracture; one patient did not undergo head imaging. No patients reported a worsening clinical seizure frequency at a 6-month follow up visit. In the subset of patients who were implanted with RNS and did not undergo concurrent resections, there was a statistically significant reduction in the average number of long episodes at the most recent visit when compared to the 1-month post-operative visit (p = 0.0268).
CONCLUSIONS: RNS is a feasible and safe option for children as young as six years with refractory epilepsy when appropriate seizure focus identification has been performed with stereo CT and stereo EEG evaluations, and can be used in conjunction with other surgical epilepsy treatment modalities. Two canister RNS placement is achievable for patients with a broad epileptogenic network or multifocal seizure onset zones.