DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.016
Safety and efficacy of atrial antitachycardia pacing in congenital heart disease.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is a common sequela in the congenital heart disease (CHD) population, and it significantly increases morbidity and mortality. Atrial antitachycardia devices (ATDs) capable of atrial antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy have been used to manage IART in the CHD population, but there are limited data on their safety and efficacy.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether ATD implantation was associated with reduced direct current (DC) cardioversions and to compare ATP success between different CHD diagnoses and ATP programs.
METHODS
A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on CHD patients with ATDs. Demographic data were collected in addition to the number of DC cardioversions required before and after ATD implantation; data on ATP efficacy and the specific ATP program utilized; and adverse events related to ATD implantation or subsequent ATP treatments.
RESULTS
ATD implantation in 91 CHD patients was associated with a significant reduction in DC cardioversions (P < .01). Overall, 72% of IART episodes were successfully terminated by ATP. Patients with levo-transposition of the great arteries experienced lower rates of ATP success than the remainder of the cohort (P < .01). There was no evidence of degeneration to ventricular arrhythmia or death directly attributed to ATP.
CONCLUSION
ATD implantation was associated with reduced DC cardioversion burden. Patients with levo-transposition of the great arteries may experience lower ATP efficacy than patients with other CHDs; however, a larger patient population is required to better determine subgroup efficacy. These results support the safety and efficacy of ATP in the CHD population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.