MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2007-1000132

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery · 1999

A comparison of five tests for determining hand sensibility.

Patel M R, Bassini L

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Three hundred seventeen normal fingers and 612 fingers in 153 hands with carpal tunnel syndrome were tested for sensibility using the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test (WEST) with calibrated monofilaments, by static two-point discrimination (s2PD) and moving two-point discrimination (m2PD), using the Disk-Criminator, and by Strauch's ten test. Equivalent Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test values were also determined as a gold standard for comparison. With both the WEST and SWM test values, the norms for interpretation have an unacceptably wide latitude because of the use of an ordinal scale of increasingly unequal intervals. With the WEST and Disk-Criminator tests, some cases of early sensory loss were missed. The SWM test apparatus, although producing relatively reliable values, is not easily portable, and its use is time-consuming in a busy office; the WEST device is prohibitively expensive. The ten test is rapid, simple, and sensitive in evaluation. It measures sensibility on a continuous analog scale, and allows for multiple points of testing in the hand, with good inter- and intra-examiner reliability. It is accurate in detecting very early loss of sensibility. In addition, the ten test requires no instrumentation.

Для цитирования: Patel M R, Bassini L. A comparison of five tests for determining hand sensibility.. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery. 1999. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1000132.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.