Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2019
A randomized phase III trial for alleviating radiation-induced xerostomia with chewing gum.
Клиническое исследование III фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kaae Julie Killerup, Stenfeldt Lone, Hyrup Birgitte, Brink Carsten, Eriksen Jesper Grau
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Xerostomia is frequently reported after radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of this study was to reduce symptoms of radiation-induced xerostomia in HNC survivors, in which the experimental arm used chewing gum for a month. Primary endpoint was changes in scoring of dry mouth as defined by EORTC QLQ-H&N35 between arms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with any grade of physician-assessed xerostomia, ≥ six month after RT, disease-free and able to chew gum were, for a month, randomized (2:1) to: (Arm A) daily chewing gum or (Arm B) standard care. Xerostomia-related QOL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and GRIX questionnaires along with measurement of salivary flow and viscosity at inclusion and after one month. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03302676).
RESULTS: Ninety-one participants were eligible for analysis (Arm A, n = 55; Arm B, n = 36). Comparing categorized scores for symptoms between arms, reduction of dry mouth was significantly higher for Arm A than Arm B (p = 0.05). A reduction in dry mouth scores was observed for xerostomia assessed by EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (question 41) for both arms. Salivary flow increased and viscosity decreased upon five minutes of stimulation within both arms (p < 0.001, respectively), however no significantly difference was observed between arms.
CONCLUSION: Categorized scores found reduction of dry mouth to be significantly higher in Arm A than Arm B, but no difference was seen for salivary flow rate and viscosity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants with any grade of physician-assessed xerostomia, ≥ six month after RT, disease-free and able to chew gum were, for a month, randomized (2:1) to: (Arm A) daily chewing gum or (Arm B) standard care. Xerostomia-related QOL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-H&N35 and GRIX questionnaires along with measurement of salivary flow and viscosity at inclusion and after one month. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03302676).
RESULTS: Ninety-one participants were eligible for analysis (Arm A, n = 55; Arm B, n = 36). Comparing categorized scores for symptoms between arms, reduction of dry mouth was significantly higher for Arm A than Arm B (p = 0.05). A reduction in dry mouth scores was observed for xerostomia assessed by EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (question 41) for both arms. Salivary flow increased and viscosity decreased upon five minutes of stimulation within both arms (p < 0.001, respectively), however no significantly difference was observed between arms.
CONCLUSION: Categorized scores found reduction of dry mouth to be significantly higher in Arm A than Arm B, but no difference was seen for salivary flow rate and viscosity.