MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.116912

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2026

Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia.

Palmerton Hannah, Williams Brooklyn, Pak Grace, Zhang Bobby, Prey Beau, Francis Andrew, Williams James, Pumiglia Luke, Roedel Erik, Lallemand Mike, McClellan John, Ieronimakis Nicholas, Bingham Jason

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

With trauma, hypothermia is associated with increased bleeding and worse outcomes yet the pace of rewarming is unproven and its influence unclear. We hypothesized that the rate of rewarming influences outcomes and evaluated its impact in a porcine model of trauma.

METHODS

Pigs underwent controlled hemorrhage and hypothermia to 32 °C for 1 h, followed by rapid or slow rewarming for 3 h. Hemodynamics and coagulation were compared along with liver gene expression.

RESULTS

The mean temperature reached between fast (37.9±0.13 °C) and slow groups (34.5±1.2 °C) was significantly different (p < 0.01). The slow group had a lower heart rate and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower with both slow and fast. No major differences in lactate, pH, coagulation or gene expression were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports rapid rewarming for reversing hypothermia post hemorrhage. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes within clinical settings.

Для цитирования: Palmerton Hannah, Williams Brooklyn, Pak Grace, Zhang Bobby, Prey Beau, Francis Andrew, Williams James, Pumiglia Luke, Roedel Erik, Lallemand Mike, McClellan John, Ieronimakis Nicholas, Bingham Jason. Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia.. American journal of surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.116912.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.