A Multidisciplinary Assessment of Standard Low Dose Versus Ultra-low Dose Chest CT Scans for Pectus Excavatum Imaging.

AIM: Evaluation of ultra-low dose chest CT imaging for the assessment of pectus excavatum severity as determined by pediatric radiologists and pediatric surgeons using Haller (HI) and Correction indices (CI).

METHODS

A single institution, prospective evaluation of patients being evaluated for pectus excavatum were scanned with a standard low-dose chest CT protocol (CARE) followed by a consecutive ultra-low dose CT scan (ULTRA). 3 surgeons and 4 radiologists were instructed to determine HI and CI in each series. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate the agreement level between CARE and ULTRA. Bland-Altman (BA) and scatter plots were also performed to determine bias of each approach.

RESULTS

32 patients had CARE and ULTRA consecutively. The ICC for HI demonstrated good reliability with a value of 0.89 and excellent reliability for CI with a value of 0.91. The reliability for HI was greater in the surgeon group (0.89) compared to the radiologist group (0.88). The reliability for CI was greater in the radiologist group (0.92) compared to the surgeon group (0.90). The Bland Altman plots for the HI and CI demonstrate no consistent bias for CARE or ULTRA approach when evaluating HI and CI.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-low dose CT scan imaging compared to standard low-dose CT appears to be a reliable alternative for evaluating PE severity as assessed by HI and CI. This work supports the evaluation and potential development of a standardized CT imaging protocol capable of reducing radiation exposure without sacrificing imaging for PE patients.