DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.162020
Vacuum Bell Therapy for Pectus Excavatum: Long-term Experience at a Single Center.
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate factors associated with excellent correction in pectus excavatum patients undergoing vacuum bell therapy (VBT).
METHODS
A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed November 2012-April 2023 to assess corrections of patients who underwent VBT. Patient demographics, presentation, and results were collected. Excellent correction was defined as complete correction or >100 % improved from an average standard chest depth of 0.51 cm. Data are reported using odds ratio & confidence intervals; and paired t-test comparison. A p-value of <0.05 was regarded as significant.
RESULTS
VBT was utilized in 431 patients with 278 patients included and 153 excluded due to loss of follow-up or incomplete data. Of those included, 89 % were male. There were 31 patients with excellent corrections (11 %) and 247 non-excellent corrections. Initial chest depth < 1.5 cm and chest wall flexibility remain important predictors of positive outcome (p=0.008 and < 0.001, respectively). Excellent correction was statistically more likely in patients aged 8 to 12.9 (OR = 2.2, p = 0.039). Surgical correction following VBT was performed in only 15.5 % (42 of 278) of our patients, none of which were in the group with an excellent correction.
CONCLUSION
Excellent correction for pectus excavatum via VBT was achieved in a small proportion of patients, with improved outcomes in those initiating therapy at a younger age, with a mild defect, and with increased chest wall flexibility. These data may be used to help determine those more likely to achieve complete correction from a nonsurgical approach and guide decisions towards treatment methods.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.