Epilepsia · 2026
Efficacy and safety of continuous midazolam infusion in the treatment of acute repetitive seizures in non-intensive settings: A multicenter retrospective real-world data study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Orsini Alessandro, Marini Lorenza, Bergonzini Luca, D'Angelo Francesco, Lelli Silvia, Foiadelli Thomas, Spreafico Eugenia, Santi Viola, Mencaroni Elisabetta, Verrotti Alberto, Ferretti Alessandro, Parisi Pasquale, Morganti Riccardo, De Lorenzo Brita, Küppers Beate, Bonuccelli Alice, Battini Roberta, Peroni Diego, Cordelli Duccio Maria
Аннотация
Seizures, when prolonged or repeated, leading to status epilepticus (SE), represent a medical emergency, requiring prompt treatment. In these conditions, the use of continuous midazolam (MDZ) infusion is often reserved for established or refractory SE and considered an anesthesiologic treatment, while evidence on its early use in non-intensive settings is still limited. To verify this approach in daily practice, we retrospectively collected data on about 42 episodes of pediatric SE or acute repetitive seizures (ARSs), treated with continuous MDZ infusion in non-intensive setting. Collected data include demographical information, previous history of epilepsy, instrumental examinations (electroencephalography [EEG] and brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), comorbidities, anti-seizure medications (ASMs), information about the event, other treatments (first- and second-line), information about MDZ infusion, and need for other third-line treatment and/or intensive care unit (ICU) transfer. Infusion durations and rates varied widely, but in most cases (38/42) low dose (<.23 mg/kg/h) were employed. The treatment was effective in 84.2% of cases, achieving both clinical and EEG response. No adverse events (AEs) were reported. The need for a second-line treatment (particularly levetiracetam [LEV] and phenobarbital [PB]) was associated with a worse outcome. Another third-line treatment was needed in 9.5% of cases. Patients (21.4%) were transferred to ICU; a higher risk of ICU admission was reported in patients with precipitating factors (infection, surgery, hypertension and suboptimal anti-seizure medication [ASM] serum levels), and those receiving MDZ infusion at higher rates and/or co-treated with PB. Overall, our study suggests that low-dose continuous MDZ infusion is an effective and safe strategy for treatment of pediatric SE and ARSs in non-intensive settings.