DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.12.019
Clinical considerations for blunt laryngotracheal trauma in children.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Systematic review of blunt pediatric laryngeal and tracheal trauma and development of proposed evaluation and management strategy.
STUDY
DESIGN
Systematic review and proposed clinical consideration algorithm.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
REVIEW
METHODS
A medical librarian was utilized.
RESULTS
329 titles and abstracts were identified, and 50 reports were included. A total of 66 children were identified, with a majority of males (76.1%). Average age was 9.5±4.4years [range 2-17]. CT was employed in 66.7% of cases. False negative CT occurred in 29.5% of cases. Treatment consisted of observation (9.1%), endoscopy alone (31.8%), endoscopic repair (7.6%), and open neck exploration with repair/open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (51.5%). Tracheotomy was utilized in 33.3% of the cases. Mortality was rare, with only one (1.5%) reported and occurred within one hour after presentation.
CONCLUSIONS
Significant deviation and variation from recommended previously proposed management algorithms exists in reported cases. Awareness of the natural clinical history, potential for severe morbidity or mortality, and associated complications are extremely important. CT and fiberoptic, bedside laryngoscopy may not play a significant role but may add to clinical evaluation prior to operative intervention. If employed, care must be taken to not create an unstable clinical scenario. Operative endoscopy is recommended in cases with positive physical examination findings, and treatment tailored to extent of injury.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.