DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000009541
The Role of Airway Management on Feeding Difficulties in Children With Pfeiffer Syndrome.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Pfeiffer syndrome is characterized by craniosynostosis, mid-face hypoplasia, broad thumbs, and often multilevel airway obstruction. Airway management is often required, including the use of positive airway ventilation, nasopharyngeal airway (NPA), or tracheostomy.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to assess the impact an airway adjunct can have on feeding difficulties in children with Pfeiffer syndrome.
METHODS
Retrospective review of patients diagnosed with Pfeiffer syndrome from January 1998 to January 2020 at one of England's 4 supraregional Craniofacial Units, Alder Hey Children's Hospital. Speech & Language Therapy case notes and medical notes were used to gather data, as well as the Oral Feeding Score component of the UK Craniofacial Outcome Score.
RESULTS
Eleven patients were included. Six patients had no airway adjunct (55%): 3 had tracheostomy (27%) and 2 patients had NPA (18%). All patients with airway adjuncts were percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy fed. Those who did not require an airway adjunct had an Oral Feeding Score of 4.60 (SD: 0.49). The children who went on to have an airway adjunct had a mean preintervention Oral Feeding Score of 2.4 (SD: 0.8). The mean feeding score (postairway adjunct) in the NPA group was 2.0, compared with the tracheostomy group scoring 3.0.
CONCLUSIONS
Children with Pfeiffer syndrome who require airway intervention have more significant feeding problems requiring feeding intervention. Although there were small numbers included in this study, there is a suggestion that airway adjuncts can contribute to feeding difficulties, particularly NPAs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.