Dual Option Microtia Clinic: A Comparison of Outcomes in Microtia Reconstruction Using Autologous Rib or Porous Polyethylene Implant.

Introduction

Auricular reconstruction techniques most frequently utilize either autologous costal cartilage or alloplastic porous polyethylene (PPE) implant.

Objectives

To compare the aesthetic outcomes, number of surgeries, and complications in children who underwent microtia reconstruction with either rib or PPE implant by blinded photograph review.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive pediatric patients who underwent auricular reconstruction with either autologous cartilage or PPE between November 2017 and February 2022. Blinded observers rated each postoperative ear through a web-based survey. Data on patient characteristics, operative time, length of admission, and complications were collected, bivariate analyses were performed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.

Results

Forty-four ears were included, 28 of which (63.6%) were reconstructed with cartilage. Median patient age was 8 years (range 4-18 years) and 29 (65.9%) were male. The cartilage group had more surgeries (median 2.5 vs. 1.0, p < 0.001), and total operating time across all surgeries did not differ significantly.

Conclusion

The two groups in our study had similar rates of complications and aesthetic scores, and aesthetic scores were worse for ears with wound complications requiring unplanned revisions.