Biventricular Repair in Interrupted Aortic Arch and Ventricular Septal Defect With a Small Left Ventricular Outflow Tract.

BACKGROUND

In patients with interrupted aortic arch and ventricular septal defect (VSD) with a small left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), either aortopulmonary amalgamation or a Ross-Konno type procedure can be performed to create stable systemic outflow. We sought to analyze factors associated with these different surgical approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent surgical repair for interrupted aortic arch/VSD at our institution between 1998 and 2017. Of these, 43 patients had a small, native LVOT that was unsuitable for systemic outflow. Patient data were retrospectively collected for this cohort and analyzed.

RESULTS

Aortopulmonary amalgamation was performed at 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 5-10) in 30 patients (group I). Within group I a primary Yasui repair with ventricular septation was performed in 3 patients and a Norwood-type repair in the other 27. Of these 27, 19 underwent subsequent biventricular conversion at 9 months (IQR, 7-11). In contrast 13 patients underwent a Ross procedure at 12 days (IQR, 6-27) (group II). Compared with group I, group II patients had a smaller VSD (3.5 vs 5.1 mm, P < .001) that was more often remote from the semilunar valves (38% vs 13%, P = .02). Operative mortality occurred in 1 group I patient (4%) at the time of biventricular conversion and 2 group II patients (15%) during the Ross procedure. After a 5.2-year (IQR, 3.2-7.4) follow-up there were 2 additional mortalities in each group, all unrelated to cardiac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

When native LVOT in interrupted aortic arch/VSD is unsuitable for systemic outflow, size and location of the VSD can be used to tailor the surgical approach to establish biventricular circulation with favorable intermediate-term outcomes.