Journal of pediatric urology · 2026
An introductory practical guide to secondary data analysis in pediatric urology.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kyaw Than S, Hampson Lindsay A, Copp Hillary L
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Secondary data analysis (SDA) has become an increasingly important approach in pediatric urology, enabling the study of long-term outcomes, care variation, and disparities in populations with chronic or congenital urologic conditions. With the growing availability of large datasets, a structured approach to designing and conducting SDA studies is increasingly relevant.
OBJECTIVES: To provide an introductory, practical guide to SDA in pediatric urology by (1) summarizing commonly used data sources with representative studies, (2) outlining a stepwise approach to designing and executing SDA studies, and (3) highlighting key methodological considerations, limitations, and opportunities for future work.
STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review of existing literature and commonly used datasets relevant to pediatric urology, including administrative claims, hospital encounter databases, clinical registries, electronic health record networks, and population-based surveys.
RESULTS: Data sources differ in scope, clinical granularity, longitudinal follow-up, and representativeness, and each is suited to specific research questions. We present a practical workflow for SDA, including dataset selection, cohort definition, and analytic planning. Linkage across datasets can provide a more comprehensive view of care patterns and outcomes, although feasibility is influenced by legal, technical, and data-quality constraints.
DISCUSSION: SDA enables population-level analyses and the study of rare conditions that are challenging to evaluate through single-center or prospective designs. However, careful cohort definition, feasibility assessment, and awareness of data limitations are essential to ensure validity and interpretability.
CONCLUSION: SDA provides a scalable, cost-efficient framework for generating meaningful evidence in pediatric urology. Continued efforts to harmonize data elements, improve linkage infrastructure, and support cross-institution collaboration will enhance the quality and impact of future research. This article provides a practical framework and examples to support the design and execution of SDA studies.
OBJECTIVES: To provide an introductory, practical guide to SDA in pediatric urology by (1) summarizing commonly used data sources with representative studies, (2) outlining a stepwise approach to designing and executing SDA studies, and (3) highlighting key methodological considerations, limitations, and opportunities for future work.
STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review of existing literature and commonly used datasets relevant to pediatric urology, including administrative claims, hospital encounter databases, clinical registries, electronic health record networks, and population-based surveys.
RESULTS: Data sources differ in scope, clinical granularity, longitudinal follow-up, and representativeness, and each is suited to specific research questions. We present a practical workflow for SDA, including dataset selection, cohort definition, and analytic planning. Linkage across datasets can provide a more comprehensive view of care patterns and outcomes, although feasibility is influenced by legal, technical, and data-quality constraints.
DISCUSSION: SDA enables population-level analyses and the study of rare conditions that are challenging to evaluate through single-center or prospective designs. However, careful cohort definition, feasibility assessment, and awareness of data limitations are essential to ensure validity and interpretability.
CONCLUSION: SDA provides a scalable, cost-efficient framework for generating meaningful evidence in pediatric urology. Continued efforts to harmonize data elements, improve linkage infrastructure, and support cross-institution collaboration will enhance the quality and impact of future research. This article provides a practical framework and examples to support the design and execution of SDA studies.