The Journal of urology · 2007
Cystostomy button for bladder drainage in children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Milliken I, Munro N P, Subramaniam R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The "button" enteral feeding systems are widely used as a gastrostomy. We describe our use of this device to facilitate bladder drainage in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively reviewed all patients who underwent insertion of a cystostomy button between 2002 and 2005. Indications and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 17 children (8 female, 9 male) with a mean age of 7.1 years underwent insertion of a cystostomy button during the 4-year period. Mean followup was 16 months (range 2 to 40). Cases selected included those with a neuropathic bladder, prune belly syndrome, previous major bladder neck surgery and those unsuitable for Mitrofanoff stoma formation. Complications included 1 wound infection treated with antibiotics. Four children had leakage from the cystostomy site that was successfully treated with a change in button size, and 14 buttons remain in situ.
CONCLUSIONS: Button cystostomy is a safe and effective form of bladder drainage in children. It is a good alternative to standard suprapubic drainage and it gives children an improved quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively reviewed all patients who underwent insertion of a cystostomy button between 2002 and 2005. Indications and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 17 children (8 female, 9 male) with a mean age of 7.1 years underwent insertion of a cystostomy button during the 4-year period. Mean followup was 16 months (range 2 to 40). Cases selected included those with a neuropathic bladder, prune belly syndrome, previous major bladder neck surgery and those unsuitable for Mitrofanoff stoma formation. Complications included 1 wound infection treated with antibiotics. Four children had leakage from the cystostomy site that was successfully treated with a change in button size, and 14 buttons remain in situ.
CONCLUSIONS: Button cystostomy is a safe and effective form of bladder drainage in children. It is a good alternative to standard suprapubic drainage and it gives children an improved quality of life.