MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s13023-023-02822-2

Медицинская библиотека · Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023

Subjective versus objective sleep in men with Klinefelter syndrome.

Fjermestad K W, Finnbakk R R, Solbakk A-K, Gravholt C H, Huster R J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To investigate sleep among men with Klinefelter syndrome (KS).

METHOD: We compared the sleep domains latency, disturbance, and efficiency in 30 men with KS (M age = 36.7 years, SD = 10.6) to 21 age-matched non-KS controls (M age = 36.8 years, SD = 14.4). Actigraphs were used to objectively measure sleep across 7 days and nights. Participants also completed a sleep diary over the same period, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

RESULTS

The mean correlation between the objective and subjective sleep measures was lower for the KS sample (M r = .15) than for controls (M r = .34). Sleep disturbance was significantly larger in the KS sample, as measured by actigraphy (p = .022, d = 0.71) and the PSQI (p = .037, d = 0.61). In regression models predicting sleep domains from KS status, age, educational level, vocational status, IQ, and mental health, KS status was not a significant predictor. Higher age was associated with more actigraphy-measured sleep disturbance. Higher educational level and being employed were associated with better sleep efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep disturbance may be a particular problem for men with KS and should be measured with complimentary methods.

Для цитирования: Fjermestad K W, Finnbakk R R, Solbakk A-K, Gravholt C H, Huster R J. Subjective versus objective sleep in men with Klinefelter syndrome.. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02822-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.