Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
Listening to the multidisciplinary care team: exploring the pediatric palliative care needs in advanced chronic kidney disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nenner Vanessa, Napierala Hendrik, Jonas Maria Agnes, Kubiak Nina, Thumfart Julia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) aims to improve the quality of life for children with life-limiting conditions, such as advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), from the time of diagnosis. However, PPC is not commonly integrated into routine pediatric nephrology care. This study explores the perspectives and experiences of healthcare providers (HCPs) to better understand the experiences and specific barriers related to PPC integration for children and adolescents with advanced CKD.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with 23 HCPs, including nurses, psychologists, social workers, and physicians from seven German pediatric nephrology centers, analyzing semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews using structured content analysis.
RESULTS: Five main categories emerged from the analysis, revealing HCPs' perceptions of CKD as a life-limiting condition, HCPs' moral distress in addressing end-of-life issues, and barriers to PPC integration. Although HCPs reported comprehensive multidisciplinary support for end-of-life situations, a lack of interprofessional communication occasionally hindered coordinated care. HCPs rarely addressed CKD's life-limiting nature proactively. A fear of diminishing hope led HCPs to avoid conversations about prognosis unless in response to a therapeutic crisis. PPC was mostly reserved for end-of-life cases, as HCPs associated PPC with terminal care and expressed concerns over distressing families.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the gap between guidelines recommending early integration of PPC and daily nephrology practice, which tends to introduce PPC late in the course of the disease. Training for nephrology teams could improve the quality of life for children with advanced CKD and their families by promoting early integration of primary PPC principles.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with 23 HCPs, including nurses, psychologists, social workers, and physicians from seven German pediatric nephrology centers, analyzing semi-structured focus groups and individual interviews using structured content analysis.
RESULTS: Five main categories emerged from the analysis, revealing HCPs' perceptions of CKD as a life-limiting condition, HCPs' moral distress in addressing end-of-life issues, and barriers to PPC integration. Although HCPs reported comprehensive multidisciplinary support for end-of-life situations, a lack of interprofessional communication occasionally hindered coordinated care. HCPs rarely addressed CKD's life-limiting nature proactively. A fear of diminishing hope led HCPs to avoid conversations about prognosis unless in response to a therapeutic crisis. PPC was mostly reserved for end-of-life cases, as HCPs associated PPC with terminal care and expressed concerns over distressing families.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the gap between guidelines recommending early integration of PPC and daily nephrology practice, which tends to introduce PPC late in the course of the disease. Training for nephrology teams could improve the quality of life for children with advanced CKD and their families by promoting early integration of primary PPC principles.