MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.061

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric surgery · 2006

Babies with esophageal and duodenal atresia: a 30-year review of a multifaceted problem.

Ein Sigmund H, Palder Steven B, Filler Robert M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review newborns with esophageal atresia (EA) with and without distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) combined with duodenal atresia (DA) or duodenal stenosis (DS) (web, windsock, diaphragm) to determine which clinical features and treatments give the best results.

METHODS

Twenty-four newborns were reviewed from 1971 to 2000 inclusive. Seven had EA and 17 had EA with TEF; 15 had DA and 9 had DS. One died after receiving only a gastrostomy. Seven underwent repair of both defects in 1 stage, whereas 16 were repaired separately.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 24 (75%) survived. The EA or EA with TEF was repaired first in 5, but the DA or DS was initially overlooked in 4 and 2 died. The DA or DS was repaired first in 11, and all survived. Of the 7 in whom both repairs were done at same setting, 4 survived. Of 6 nonsurvivors, 5 were repaired. Mortality from EA was greater than EA with TEF, and DA was greater than DS. Associated anomalies in 18 (75%) of 24 did not affect survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Staged repair (ideally within 1 week) is a safe suitable method of management. In EA, the coexistence of DA or DS must be considered because delay in diagnosis may adversely affect outcome. Mortality is a multifactorial phenomenon.

Для цитирования: Ein Sigmund H, Palder Steven B, Filler Robert M. Babies with esophageal and duodenal atresia: a 30-year review of a multifaceted problem.. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.11.061.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.