Sleep medicine · 2022
Prevalence of mouth breathing, with or without nasal obstruction, in children with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bokov Plamen, Dahan Jacques, Boujemla Imène, Dudoignon Benjamin, André Charles-Victor, Bennaceur Selim, Teissier Natacha, Delclaux Christophe
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Mouth breathing (MB) is a symptom of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children, but its diagnosis remains challenging. The main objectives of our study were to evaluate whether parents' and physician's diagnose of MB were concordant and to evaluate the prevalence of nasal obstruction in children with OSA and MB.
METHODS: Ninety-three children (median age: 10.6 years, range 3-18) with moderate to severe OSA prospectively underwent otorhinolaryngologist (endoscopy, acoustic rhinometry and pharyngometry allowing calculation of pharyngeal compliance) and orthodontist (clinical exam and cephalometry) assessments together with parental interview (daytime MB: never, sometimes, often, always). MB was also assessed by the otorhinolaryngologist (nasal obstruction on endoscopy) and the orthodontist (incompetent lips or anterior open bite or low tongue position).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight children (41%) were mouth (parental criterion: MB often or always, median age 8.2 years) and 55 nasal (11.4 years, p = 0.016) breathers. The agreement of parental and physician diagnosis of MB was slight (orthodontist) to moderate (otorhinolaryngologist). Parental diagnosis of MB was associated with nasal obstruction on acoustic rhinometry and endoscopy (hypertrophy of inferior turbinate, n = 18 or adenoids, n = 15) and with an adenoid facies (increased Frankfort's mandibular plane angle on cephalometry). Eleven children had MB by habit and were characterized by more severe OSA and higher pharyngeal compliance than mouth breathers with nasal obstruction.
CONCLUSION: MB diagnosis by parents is acceptable and is mainly related to nasal obstruction. A subset of children had MB by habit associated with worst OSA and increased pharyngeal compliance that could benefit from myofunctional therapy.
METHODS: Ninety-three children (median age: 10.6 years, range 3-18) with moderate to severe OSA prospectively underwent otorhinolaryngologist (endoscopy, acoustic rhinometry and pharyngometry allowing calculation of pharyngeal compliance) and orthodontist (clinical exam and cephalometry) assessments together with parental interview (daytime MB: never, sometimes, often, always). MB was also assessed by the otorhinolaryngologist (nasal obstruction on endoscopy) and the orthodontist (incompetent lips or anterior open bite or low tongue position).
RESULTS: Thirty-eight children (41%) were mouth (parental criterion: MB often or always, median age 8.2 years) and 55 nasal (11.4 years, p = 0.016) breathers. The agreement of parental and physician diagnosis of MB was slight (orthodontist) to moderate (otorhinolaryngologist). Parental diagnosis of MB was associated with nasal obstruction on acoustic rhinometry and endoscopy (hypertrophy of inferior turbinate, n = 18 or adenoids, n = 15) and with an adenoid facies (increased Frankfort's mandibular plane angle on cephalometry). Eleven children had MB by habit and were characterized by more severe OSA and higher pharyngeal compliance than mouth breathers with nasal obstruction.
CONCLUSION: MB diagnosis by parents is acceptable and is mainly related to nasal obstruction. A subset of children had MB by habit associated with worst OSA and increased pharyngeal compliance that could benefit from myofunctional therapy.