MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s100960050011

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2000

Clinical significance of Scedosporium apiospermum in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Cimon B, Carrère J, Vinatier J F, Chazalette J P, Chabasse D, Bouchara J P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The incidence of airway colonization by Scedosporium apiospermum and of related sensitization was investigated prospectively in 128 patients with cystic fibrosis over a 5-year period, and results were compared with clinical data. Scedosporium apio-spermum, recovered from sputum samples in 11 of 128 (8.6%) patients, was the most frequent filamentous fungus after Aspergillus fumigatus. Counterimmuno-electrophoresis, used to detect scedosporiosis serologically, was positive in 27 of 128 (21.1%) patients. The discrepancy between the mycological and serological results may be related to immune cross-reactions between Scedosporium apiospermum and Aspergillus fumigatus. However, symptoms of allergic bronchopulmonary disease were observed in two patients chronically colonized by Scedosporium apiospermum. The results clearly demonstrate that the frequency of this fungus is largely underestimated and that it may trigger an inflammatory response, thus suggesting a pathogenic role in patients with cystic fibrosis.

Для цитирования: Cimon B, Carrère J, Vinatier J F, Chazalette J P, Chabasse D, Bouchara J P. Clinical significance of Scedosporium apiospermum in patients with cystic fibrosis.. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2000. DOI: 10.1007/s100960050011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.