DOI 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2022.105489
A cone beam computed tomography study based on three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of relationships between the lip-line and jaw deformity.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to use the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to study the relationships between the lip-line and mandible deformity.
DESIGN
CBCT data of 20 patients with jaw deformity (experimental group) and 20 patients without mandible deformity (control group) were selected. Use three-dimensional cephalometry to measure the reconstructed images of CBCT data simulated by the Materialise Interactive Medical Image Control System (Mimics), mark the related points, lines and planes of the three-dimensional craniomaxillofacial structure, and measure relevant distances and angles. The T-test, Pearson correlation analysis and Linear regression were used to analyze the characteristics of the lip-line and jaw deformity.
RESULTS
There was a significant difference in the lip-line between mandible deformity group and control group. Significant positive correlations could been found among the lip-line cant, the occlusal plane cant, the mandibular plane cant and the degree of mandible deformity (r=0.964, 0.942, 0.611, P < 0.01). A linear relationship was found between the left lip-line cant Y and the menton deviation X [the mandible deflection to the right was defined as positive, and the left lip-line below frankfort horizontal was viewed as positive] as Y= 0.340 + 0.505X.
CONCLUSIONS
The lip-line of patients with jaw deformity was inclined, and the lip-line cant was positively correlated with the degree of mandible deformity, and there was a certain linear relationship between the two, which could provide a theoretical reference for clinicians to diagnose and treat patients with mandible deformity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.