MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/21501351251412887

Медицинская библиотека · World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2026

Three Decades of Evidence on Pulsatile Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Pediatrics: No Significant Clinical Benefit.

Ündar Akif, Lussier Marc J, Rajesh Srihari, Dayi Kevsergül

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BackgroundDrawing on more than 30 years of valuable expertise in in-vitro, in-vivo, and clinical trials, we report the key findings of our institutional research on pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).MethodsA detailed search was performed in the National Institutes of Health National Library of Medicine, focusing on the PubMed database. This search combined key terms such as "Pulsatile flow," "Cardiopulmonary Bypass," "Undar A," "Vital Organ Injury," "Clinical outcomes," "Pediatrics," and "Neonates and infants" to find relevant peer-reviewed publications.ResultsA comprehensive review article was crafted by analyzing 88 peer-reviewed studies published between 1996 and 2025. This research provided substantial scientific evidence on optimizing neonatal and pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuitry, focusing not only on pump performance but also on selecting appropriate oxygenators and arterial cannulas for effective pulsatile flow. While significant benefits regarding cerebral hemodynamics were observed in neonatal piglet models using pulsatile flow in conjunction with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, the results from randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies raised questions regarding its efficacy. Despite some promising indications of improved Apolipoprotein E and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1/tissue plasminogen activator ratios, a rigorous randomized clinical trial involving 159 patients, along with a comprehensive retrospective study of 284 patients at Penn State Health Children's Hospital, demonstrated no significant clinical advantage of pulsatile flow compared with nonpulsatile flow. Importantly, while pulsatile flow did not provide a measurable benefit, it also did not result in any adverse outcomes in our clinical trials.ConclusionsThe existing evidence clearly indicates that pulsatile CPB does not provide significant short-term or long-term benefits for pediatric patients undergoing congenital heart surgery.

Для цитирования: Ündar Akif, Lussier Marc J, Rajesh Srihari, Dayi Kevsergül. Three Decades of Evidence on Pulsatile Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Pediatrics: No Significant Clinical Benefit.. World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/21501351251412887.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.