International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
Distinct Prognostic Roles of Grade Group and Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ikeda Junichi, Taniguchi Hisanori, Inoue Monta, Masuo Yuki, Nakamoto Takahiro, Taguchi Makoto, Shimada Seiji, Mishima Takao, Yanishi Masaaki, Uchida Katsunori, Kinoshita Hidefumi
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of grade group (GG) and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), as established prognostic factors, on clinical endpoints in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients treated with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients with mHSPC treated with androgen deprivation therapy and ARSIs (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or apalutamide). Associations between clinicopathological factors, including GG 5 and IDC-P, and prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: GG 5 was identified in 66% of patients, and IDC-P was present in 51% of patients. GG 5 was an independent predictor of PSA-PFS, whereas IDC-P was not. In contrast, IDC-P was independently associated with poorer CSS, while GG was not. Neither IDC-P nor GG was significantly associated with OS. The combined evaluation of GG 5 and IDC-P showed the best prognostic predictive ability for PSA-PFS, CSS, and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ARSI-treated mHSPC, both GG 5 and IDC-P are important prognostic factors, although they play distinct roles in predicting clinical outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 147 patients with mHSPC treated with androgen deprivation therapy and ARSIs (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or apalutamide). Associations between clinicopathological factors, including GG 5 and IDC-P, and prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
RESULTS: GG 5 was identified in 66% of patients, and IDC-P was present in 51% of patients. GG 5 was an independent predictor of PSA-PFS, whereas IDC-P was not. In contrast, IDC-P was independently associated with poorer CSS, while GG was not. Neither IDC-P nor GG was significantly associated with OS. The combined evaluation of GG 5 and IDC-P showed the best prognostic predictive ability for PSA-PFS, CSS, and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ARSI-treated mHSPC, both GG 5 and IDC-P are important prognostic factors, although they play distinct roles in predicting clinical outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesNitrilesAgedNeoplasm GradingBenzamidesProstate-Specific AntigenAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsAged, 80 and overMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalSignal TransductionProstateReceptors, AndrogenPhenylthiohydantoinAbiraterone AcetateThiohydantoins