MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000534777

Медицинская библиотека · Neonatology · 2023

Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Registry-Based Observational Study.

Switchenko Nora, Shukla Vivek, Mwenechanya Musaku, Chomba Elwyn, Patel Archana, Hibberd Patricia L, Ambalavanan Namasivayam, Figueroa Lester, Mazariegos Manolo, Krebs Nancy F, Goudar Shivaprasad S, Derman Richard, Esamai Fabian, Liechty Edward A, Bucher Sheri, Saleem Sarah, Goldenberg Robert L, Lokangaka Adrien, Tshefu Antoinette, Bose Carl L, Koso-Thomas Marion, Tan Sylvia, Nolen Tracy, McClure Elizabeth M, Carlo Waldemar A

Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns.

METHODS

This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression.

RESULTS

177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants.

Для цитирования: Switchenko Nora, Shukla Vivek, Mwenechanya Musaku, Chomba Elwyn, Patel Archana, Hibberd Patricia L, Ambalavanan Namasivayam, Figueroa Lester, Mazariegos Manolo, Krebs Nancy F, Goudar Shivaprasad S, Derman Richard, Esamai Fabian, Liechty Edward A, Bucher Sheri, Saleem Sarah, Goldenberg Robert L, Lokangaka Adrien, Tshefu Antoinette, Bose Carl L, Koso-Thomas Marion, Tan Sylvia, Nolen Tracy, McClure Elizabeth M, Carlo Waldemar A. Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Registry-Based Observational Study.. Neonatology. 2023. DOI: 10.1159/000534777.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.