Arthroscopic pullout repair versus suture anchor repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear combined with high tibial osteotomy.

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pullout repair with a metal button and suture anchor repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy with varus alignment.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic pullout repair (P group) and suture anchor repair (SA group) in combination with open-wedge high tibial osteotomy between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively examined. Patients who received second-look arthroscopy at 1 year and at least 2 years of follow up were included. Structural healing (complete/partial or failed healing) and chondral lesions at the initial surgery and the second-look arthroscopy, radiographic parameters around the knee, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale (before and 2 years after surgery) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients (68 women/20 men, mean age 61.1 ± 7.9 years old) were included in the analysis. Of these, 51 patients underwent pullout repair, while the other 37 underwent suture anchor repair. The SA group showed a significantly higher rate of complete healing (64.9%) than the P group (21.6%, P < 0.001). The Lysholm score significantly improved after surgery in both treatment groups. At the final follow up, the SA group had a significantly higher Lysholm score (89.6 ± 10.7) than the P group (80.9 ± 17.4, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic suture anchor repair had superior healing status and Lysholm Score in comparison with pullout repair with a metal button, as it achieved better tension adjustment. This result is meaningful particularly when medial meniscus root repair and high tibial osteotomy are performed simultaneously.