MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00006534-199803000-00026

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 1998

Vascularized double-sided preputial island flap with W flap glanuloplasty for hypospadias repair.

Yavuzer R, Baran C, Latifoğlu O, Cenetoğlu S, Baran N K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Hypospadias surgery is one of the most challenging surgical interventions that still need further refinements for increased success rates. During the last 5 years, we operated on 26 mid-penile or proximal hypospadias cases by using vascularized double-sided preputial island flap and W flap glanuloplasty to achieve superior functional and aesthetic results. Follow-up period of the patients revealed a 92.3 percent success rate with a single operation. Two cases developed fistula, which was located at the proximal anastomosis site. However, they were repaired in a second sitting without any additional problem. The basic aim in hypospadias surgery is the correction of chordee, reconstruction of urethra, and sufficient ventral penile skin coverage in one stage with minimal complication. The use of vascularized tissue for urethral reconstruction and ventral coverage is believed to have a superior healing capacity with better functional and cosmetic outcome. On the other hand, adding W flap glanuloplasty to this technique avoids the risk of meatal stenosis. We conclude that by combining the two above-mentioned techniques, it is possible to cope better with this devastating congenital deformity.

Для цитирования: Yavuzer R, Baran C, Latifoğlu O, Cenetoğlu S, Baran N K. Vascularized double-sided preputial island flap with W flap glanuloplasty for hypospadias repair.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199803000-00026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.