MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bot.0000000000001876

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021

Static and Dynamic External Fixation are Equally Effective for Unstable Elbow Fracture-Dislocations.

AlQahtani Saad, Aibinder William R, Parry Joshua A, Seltser Anna, Athwal George S, King Graham J W, Steinmann Scott P, Faber Kenneth J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of static versus dynamic external fixation for elbow fracture-dislocations with persistent instability after surgical management.

DESIGN

Comparative, retrospective review.

SETTING

Two tertiary referral upper-extremity centers.

PATIENTS: Twenty-four elbows requiring external fixation for persistent elbow instability within 90 days of surgical management of an elbow fracture-dislocation.

INTERVENTION: Static and dynamic external fixation was used in 16 and 8 patients, respectively, for a median of 39 days (interquartile range, 33-48 days).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Elbow range of motion, complications, and revision surgeries.

RESULTS

Immediately after static and dynamic external fixation removal, there was no difference in elbow extension [33 degrees ± 16 degrees vs. 41 degrees ± 13 degrees, mean difference (MD) 7 degrees, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6 degrees-22 degrees] or flexion (114 degrees ± 35 degrees vs. 118 degrees ± 11 degrees, MD 4 degrees, 95% CI -23 degrees-132 degrees), respectively. At last follow-up, static and dynamic external fixation groups had no difference in elbow extension (27 degrees ± 13 degrees vs. 24 degrees ± 10 degrees, MD -3 degrees, 95% CI -15 degrees-7 degrees) or flexion (129 degrees ± 12 degrees vs. 128 degrees ± 14 degrees, MD -1 degree, 95% CI -13 degrees-10 degrees), respectively. Static and dynamic external fixation groups had no difference in complications [7 (44%) vs. 5 (63%), difference 19%, 95% CI -23%-54%] or revision surgeries [6 (38%) vs. 4 (50%), difference 13%, 95% CI -27%-49%].

CONCLUSIONS

No difference in range of motion, complications, and revision surgeries was detected after static versus dynamic external fixation of persistently unstable elbow fracture-dislocations. Due to ease of application, static external fixation is our preferred treatment for these injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Для цитирования: AlQahtani Saad, Aibinder William R, Parry Joshua A, Seltser Anna, Athwal George S, King Graham J W, Steinmann Scott P, Faber Kenneth J. Static and Dynamic External Fixation are Equally Effective for Unstable Elbow Fracture-Dislocations.. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001876.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.