Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Adaptation of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Case Descriptions for Family Communication.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
García-Rudolph Alejandro, Berenguel Marc Navarro, Opisso Eloy, Aparicio Celeste, Rodriguez Pablo, Enseñat Antonia
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We examined whether GPT-4o, a widely used large language model (LLM), could produce age- and education-appropriate versions of complex pediatric traumatic brain injury case descriptions, while preserving clinical accuracy and emotional tone.
METHODS: Five cases were adapted into four audience scenarios. Text complexity was assessed via Flesch-Kincaid (FKS), Gunning Fog, and SMOG indices. Clinical human experts rated text fidelity and emotional appropriateness on a 3-point scale.
RESULTS: Original texts showed very high complexity (FKS 18.2-20.5), equivalent to 18-20 years of education. Adaptations for parents with high school education were often over-simplified (FKS 4.75-7.1), while versions for 12-year-olds were well-matched (FKS ~5-6). Texts for 8-year-olds had FKS scores of 4.0-6.8 (above grade 2-3 targets) and reduced fidelity (scores 1-2). Emotional tone was consistently rated appropriate across all audiences.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians may use LLMs to draft explanations, but must carefully review and tailor them.
METHODS: Five cases were adapted into four audience scenarios. Text complexity was assessed via Flesch-Kincaid (FKS), Gunning Fog, and SMOG indices. Clinical human experts rated text fidelity and emotional appropriateness on a 3-point scale.
RESULTS: Original texts showed very high complexity (FKS 18.2-20.5), equivalent to 18-20 years of education. Adaptations for parents with high school education were often over-simplified (FKS 4.75-7.1), while versions for 12-year-olds were well-matched (FKS ~5-6). Texts for 8-year-olds had FKS scores of 4.0-6.8 (above grade 2-3 targets) and reduced fidelity (scores 1-2). Emotional tone was consistently rated appropriate across all audiences.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians may use LLMs to draft explanations, but must carefully review and tailor them.