MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0331

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of hand surgery · 1999

Lengthening of pediatric forearm deformities using the Ilizarov technique: functional and cosmetic results.

Raimondo R A, Skaggs D L, Rosenwasser M P, Dick H M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Eight patients (average age, 10 years) had a unilateral forearm lengthening procedure using the technique developed by Ilizarov. The procedure was performed in 4 patients with radial agenesis, in 2 with multiple hereditary exostosis, in 1 with ulnar agenesis, and in 1 with multiple enchondromatosis. Patients underwent distraction osteogenesis through either a unifocal or bifocal corticotomy. Forearm length increased on average 6.0 cm (range, 3.6-8.1 cm) or 54% (range, 21% to 94%) with a lengthening index of 1.3 months per centimeter (range, 0.6-1.9 months per centimeter). The length of follow-up averaged 4.5 years and involved office examinations with task evaluation and a questionnaire addressing function and appearance. Limb length discrepancy at follow-up measured 3.7 cm (range, 0.0-8.0 cm). Lengthening of the forearm was found to improve upper extremity function; it allowed the patient to reach distant body parts and to perform select activities requiring near-equal arm length. Forearm lengthening also improved the appearance of the arm if adequate soft tissue was preserved. Full restoration of arm length was not a requirement for a successful outcome and patient satisfaction with the results of the procedure was high.

Для цитирования: Raimondo R A, Skaggs D L, Rosenwasser M P, Dick H M. Lengthening of pediatric forearm deformities using the Ilizarov technique: functional and cosmetic results.. The Journal of hand surgery. 1999. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0331.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.