MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Molecular vision · 2014

Mutation survey of candidate genes in 40 Chinese patients with congenital ectopia lentis.

Li Jie, Jia Xiaoyun, Li Shiqiang, Fang Shaohua, Guo Xiangming

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To identify the spectrum and frequency of five candidate genes in Chinese patients with congenital ectopia lentis (EL).

METHODS

Forty consecutive and unrelated congenital probands with EL were collected and underwent ocular, skeletal, and cardiovascular examinations. Sanger sequencing was used to analyze all of the coding and adjacent regions of five candidate genes: FBN1, ADAMTS10, ADAMTSL4, TGFBR2, and CBS. Mutation analysis was performed to evaluate the pathogenic variants and to identify the cause of congenital EL.

RESULTS

The FBN1 gene screen revealed 25 pathogenic variants in 34 of the 40 families with congenital EL, including three novel (c.1955G>T, c.2222delA, and c.4381T>C) and 22 known mutations. The ADAMTSL10 gene screen revealed a compound heterozygous variant (c.1586G>A and c.2485T>A) in a family with Weill-Marchesani syndrome (WMS). In the remaining five probands, no pathogenic variant was detected in any of the five screened genes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we identified three novel and 22 known mutations in FBN1 in 34 of 40 EL families. The results expand the mutation spectrum of the FBN1 gene and suggest that FBN1 mutations may be the major cause of congenital EL in Chinese patients.

Для цитирования: Li Jie, Jia Xiaoyun, Li Shiqiang, Fang Shaohua, Guo Xiangming. Mutation survey of candidate genes in 40 Chinese patients with congenital ectopia lentis.. Molecular vision. 2014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.