MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.013

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023

Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Watanabe Hirotoshi, Morimoto Takeshi, Natsuaki Masahiro, Yamamoto Ko, Obayashi Yuki, Nishikawa Ryusuke, Ando Kenji, Ono Koh, Kadota Kazushige, Suwa Satoru, Morishima Itsuro, Yoshida Ruka, Hata Yoshiki, Akao Masaharu, Yagi Masahiro, Suematsu Nobuhiro, Morino Yoshihiro, Yokomatsu Takafumi, Takamisawa Itaru, Noda Toshiyuki, Doi Masayuki, Okayama Hideki, Nakamura Yuichi, Hibi Kiyoshi, Sakamoto Hiroki, Noguchi Teruo, Kimura Takeshi, STOPDAPT-2 Investigators

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether clopidogrel is better suited than aspirin as the long-term antiplatelet monotherapy following dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

OBJECTIVES

This study compared clopidogrel monotherapy following 1 month of DAPT (clopidogrel group) with aspirin monotherapy following 12 months of DAPT (aspirin group) after PCI for 5 years.

METHODS

STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy 2) is a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in Japan. Patients who underwent PCI with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized in a 1-to-1 fashion either to clopidogrel or aspirin groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis) or major bleeding (TIMI major or minor bleeding).

RESULTS

Among 3,005 study patients (age: 68.6 ± 10.7 years; women: 22.3%; acute coronary syndrome: 38.3%), 2,934 patients (97.6%) completed the 5-year follow-up (adherence to the study drugs at 395 days: 84.7% and 75.9%). The clopidogrel group compared with the aspirin group was noninferior but not superior for the primary endpoint (11.75% and 13.57%, respectively; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70-1.05; Pnoninferiority < 0.001; Psuperiority = 0.13), whereas it was superior for the cardiovascular outcomes (8.61% and 11.05%, respectively; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.97; P = 0.03) and not superior for major bleeding (4.44% and 4.92%, respectively; HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.64-1.25; P = 0.51). By the 1-year landmark analysis, clopidogrel was numerically, but not significantly, superior to aspirin for cardiovascular events (6.79% and 8.68%, respectively; HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59-1.01; P = 0.06) without difference in major bleeding (3.99% and 3.32%, respectively; HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.84-1.81; P = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Clopidogrel might be an attractive alternative to aspirin with a borderline ischemic benefit beyond 1 year after PCI.

Для цитирования: Watanabe Hirotoshi, Morimoto Takeshi, Natsuaki Masahiro, Yamamoto Ko, Obayashi Yuki, Nishikawa Ryusuke, Ando Kenji, Ono Koh, Kadota Kazushige, Suwa Satoru, Morishima Itsuro, Yoshida Ruka, Hata Yoshiki, Akao Masaharu, Yagi Masahiro, Suematsu Nobuhiro, Morino Yoshihiro, Yokomatsu Takafumi, Takamisawa Itaru, Noda Toshiyuki, Doi Masayuki, Okayama Hideki, Nakamura Yuichi, Hibi Kiyoshi, Sakamoto Hiroki, Noguchi Teruo, Kimura Takeshi, STOPDAPT-2 Investigators. Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.