MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mjd.2001.113474

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2001

Childhood vulvar lichen sclerosus: an increasingly common problem.

Powell J, Wojnarowska F

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lichen sclerosus (LS) of the vulva in children is presenting more commonly, but its origin is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of childhood vulvar LS, to examine factors that may play a role in its cause, and to attempt to define the current optimal treatment.

METHODS

We surveyed 70 cases of LS currently being treated in the pediatric vulvar clinic to collect information on presentation, family history, associated disease, and typical course of the disorder. We looked retrospectively and prospectively at treatments for LS.

RESULTS

We found a prevalence of premenarchal LS of 1 in 900 and confirmed an increasing incidence. In a high proportion of cases (77%), the question of sexual abuse had been raised. A family history of LS was found in a minimum of 17% of cases. Associated autoimmune disease occurred in 14%, but 64% told of a family history, and atopy occurred in 59%. Potent topical steroid ointments appear to alleviate symptoms most effectively, with minimal side effects.

CONCLUSION

Although the cause of LS remains uncertain, it is not a rare disease in prepubertal girls. Current optimal management includes prompt diagnosis and institution of treatment with a potent topical steroid.

Для цитирования: Powell J, Wojnarowska F. Childhood vulvar lichen sclerosus: an increasingly common problem.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2001. DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2001.113474.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.