Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2014
MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta.
Clinical StudyСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goubergrits Leonid, Riesenkampff Eugenie, Yevtushenko Pavlo, Schaller Jens, Kertzscher Ulrich, Hennemuth Anja, Berger Felix, Schubert Stephan, Kuehne Titus
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To reduce the need for diagnostic catheterization and optimize treatment in a variety of congenital heart diseases, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is proposed. However, data about the accuracy of CFD in a clinical context are still sparse. To fill this gap, this study compares MRI-based CFD to catheterization in the coarctation of aorta (CoA) setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with CoA were investigated by routine MRI prior to catheterization. 3D whole-heart MRI was used to reconstruct geometries and 4D flow-sensitive phase-contrast MRI was used to acquire flows. Peak systolic flows were simulated using the program FLUENT.
RESULTS: Peak systolic pressure drops in CoA measured by catheterization and CFD correlated significantly for both pre- and posttreatment measurements (pre: r = 0.98, p = 0.00; post: r = 0.87, p = 0.00). The pretreatment bias was -0.5 ± 3.33 mmHg (95% confidence interval -2.55 to 1.47 mmHg). CFD predicted a reduction of the peak systolic pressure drop after treatment that ranged from 17.6 ± 5.56 mmHg to 6.7 ± 5.58 mmHg. The posttreatment bias was 3.0 ± 2.91 mmHg (95% CI -1.74 to 5.43 mmHg).
CONCLUSION: Peak systolic pressure drops can be reliably calculated using MRI-based CFD in a clinical setting. Therefore, CFD might be an attractive noninvasive alternative to diagnostic catheterization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with CoA were investigated by routine MRI prior to catheterization. 3D whole-heart MRI was used to reconstruct geometries and 4D flow-sensitive phase-contrast MRI was used to acquire flows. Peak systolic flows were simulated using the program FLUENT.
RESULTS: Peak systolic pressure drops in CoA measured by catheterization and CFD correlated significantly for both pre- and posttreatment measurements (pre: r = 0.98, p = 0.00; post: r = 0.87, p = 0.00). The pretreatment bias was -0.5 ± 3.33 mmHg (95% confidence interval -2.55 to 1.47 mmHg). CFD predicted a reduction of the peak systolic pressure drop after treatment that ranged from 17.6 ± 5.56 mmHg to 6.7 ± 5.58 mmHg. The posttreatment bias was 3.0 ± 2.91 mmHg (95% CI -1.74 to 5.43 mmHg).
CONCLUSION: Peak systolic pressure drops can be reliably calculated using MRI-based CFD in a clinical setting. Therefore, CFD might be an attractive noninvasive alternative to diagnostic catheterization.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAortic CoarctationBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureCardiac-Gated Imaging TechniquesComputer SimulationFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedModels, CardiovascularMyocardial Perfusion ImagingReproducibility of ResultsRheologySensitivity and SpecificityTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult