MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/00258172231191075

Медицинская библиотека · The Medico-legal journal · 2023

Traumatic injuries by conducted electrical weapons: Case report of self-injury to the hand during stun gun training.

Passalacqua Pierluigi, Pallocci Margherita, De Luca Lucilla, Zanovello Claudia, Bragaglia Mario, Treglia Michele

СтатьяКлинический случайПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The use of non-lethal weapons has spread worldwide, being introduced as an alternative to firearms in many countries such as the United States or the United Kingdom. Among non-lethal weapons, conducted electrical weapons have been adopted worldwide, to control unruly suspected criminals or to neutralise violent situations. The stun gun belongs to this category and is the most widely available, with more than 140,000 units in use by police officers in the field in the US, and an additional 100,000 electrical stun guns owned by civilians worldwide. In Italy, the use of conducted electrical weapons by law enforcement has only recently been introduced, with private use and commercialisation still prohibited, mainly due to controversies related to the potential dangers of such devices.Before the official adoption, several experiments had to be carried out, with mechanisms that reproduced the ballistics of the stun gun. Here we present the case of a man who suffered a self-injury trauma to his hand during a ballistics exercise with a crossbow loaded with stun gun probes.

Для цитирования: Passalacqua Pierluigi, Pallocci Margherita, De Luca Lucilla, Zanovello Claudia, Bragaglia Mario, Treglia Michele. Traumatic injuries by conducted electrical weapons: Case report of self-injury to the hand during stun gun training.. The Medico-legal journal. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/00258172231191075.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.