Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2013
[Non-thoracoscopic and thoracoscopic modified Nuss procedure for correction of pectus excavatum].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Wenliang, Kong Demiao, Yu Fenglei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the curative effect, safety and experience of non-thoracoscopic modified Nuss procedure for correction of pectus excavatum (PE).
METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2011, 267 cases of PE patients were selected in our hospital. Among them 85 were treated by thoracoscopic minimally invasive modified Nuss Procedure and 182 by non-thoracoscopic procedure. The operation time, blood loss during operation, length of postoperative hospital stay and effect of treatment were compared retrospectively.
RESULTS: All the 267 patients finished the repair procedure smoothly. The non-thoracoscopic group had advantage in terms of operative time (22.5 min vs 35.1 min, P<0.05). As for the blood loss during operation, length of postoperative hospital stay and effect of treatment, there was no significant difference among the 2 groups (P>0.05). There were no deaths.
CONCLUSION: Non-thoracoscopic minimally invasive modified Nuss procedure is as safe and effective as thoracoscopic Nuss procedure. With advantages of simplified operation procedure and shorter operation time, it is easier in practice.
METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2011, 267 cases of PE patients were selected in our hospital. Among them 85 were treated by thoracoscopic minimally invasive modified Nuss Procedure and 182 by non-thoracoscopic procedure. The operation time, blood loss during operation, length of postoperative hospital stay and effect of treatment were compared retrospectively.
RESULTS: All the 267 patients finished the repair procedure smoothly. The non-thoracoscopic group had advantage in terms of operative time (22.5 min vs 35.1 min, P<0.05). As for the blood loss during operation, length of postoperative hospital stay and effect of treatment, there was no significant difference among the 2 groups (P>0.05). There were no deaths.
CONCLUSION: Non-thoracoscopic minimally invasive modified Nuss procedure is as safe and effective as thoracoscopic Nuss procedure. With advantages of simplified operation procedure and shorter operation time, it is easier in practice.