Intensive care medicine · 2007
Sleep during proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors in critically ill patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alexopoulou C, Kondili E, Vakouti E, Klimathianaki M, Prinianakis G, Georgopoulos D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+) automatically adjusts the flow and volume assist to represent constant fractions of resistance and elastance of the respiratory system, respectively. Resistance and elastance are calculated at random intervals of 4-10 breaths, by applying a 300 ms pause maneuver at the end of selected inspirations.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the large number of end-inspiratory occlusions during PAV+ operation influences sleep quality in critically ill patients who exhibited good patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support (PS, baseline).
METHODS: One and two nights' polysomnography was performed in sedated (protocol A, n=11) and non-sedated (protocol B, n=9) patients, respectively, while respiratory variables were continuously recorded. In each protocol the patients were ventilated with PAV+ and PS at two levels of assist (baseline and high).
RESULTS: In both protocols sleep quality did not differ between the modes of support or the assist levels. In sedated patients sleep efficiency was slightly but significantly higher with PAV+ than with high PS, while it did not differ between modes in non-sedated patients. The two modes of support had comparable effects on respiratory variables. Independent of the mode of support and particularly at high assist, a significant proportion of patients developed periodic breathing during sleep (27% in protocol A and 44% in protocol B).
CONCLUSION: In patients exhibiting good patient-ventilator synchrony during PS, the large number of short-term end-inspiratory occlusions with PAV+ operation did not adversely influence sleep quality. With both modes high assist may cause unstable breathing during sleep.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the large number of end-inspiratory occlusions during PAV+ operation influences sleep quality in critically ill patients who exhibited good patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support (PS, baseline).
METHODS: One and two nights' polysomnography was performed in sedated (protocol A, n=11) and non-sedated (protocol B, n=9) patients, respectively, while respiratory variables were continuously recorded. In each protocol the patients were ventilated with PAV+ and PS at two levels of assist (baseline and high).
RESULTS: In both protocols sleep quality did not differ between the modes of support or the assist levels. In sedated patients sleep efficiency was slightly but significantly higher with PAV+ than with high PS, while it did not differ between modes in non-sedated patients. The two modes of support had comparable effects on respiratory variables. Independent of the mode of support and particularly at high assist, a significant proportion of patients developed periodic breathing during sleep (27% in protocol A and 44% in protocol B).
CONCLUSION: In patients exhibiting good patient-ventilator synchrony during PS, the large number of short-term end-inspiratory occlusions with PAV+ operation did not adversely influence sleep quality. With both modes high assist may cause unstable breathing during sleep.