MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/eja.0000000000001360

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of anaesthesiology · 2020

Postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone; comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with target-controlled infusion and standard patient-controlled analgesia: A randomised controlled trial.

Wehrfritz Andreas, Ihmsen Harald, Fuchte Tobias, Kim Michael, Kremer Sven, Weiß Alexander, Schüttler Jürgen, Jeleazcov Christian

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The challenge of managing acute postoperative pain is the well tolerated and effective administration of analgesics with a minimum of side effects. The standard therapeutic approach is patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with systemic opioids. To overcome problems of oscillating opioid concentrations, we studied patient-controlled analgesia by target-controlled infusion (TCI-PCA) as an alternative.

OBJECTIVE

To compare efficacy, safety and side effects of standard PCA with TCI-PCA for postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone.

DESIGN

Single-blinded, randomised trial.

SETTING

University Hospital, Germany from December 2013 to April 2015.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS: Postoperative pain therapy on the ICU was managed with intravenous (i.v.) hydromorphone and patients randomised to TCI-PCA with target plasma concentrations between 0.8 and 10 ng ml, or PCA with bolus doses of 0.2 mg. Pain was regularly assessed using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and cardiac output were continuously monitored, and adverse events were registered throughout the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: NRS pain ratings, hydromorphone doses, haemodynamic effects and side effects.

RESULTS

NRS pain ratings, total doses of hydromorphone and haemodynamic data did not differ significantly between TCI-PCA and PCA. The number of bolus doses during PCA was significantly higher than the number of target increases during TCI-PCA (P = 0.006). The number of negative requests was also significantly higher during PCA than during TCI-PCA (P = 0.02). The respiratory rate on the first postoperative morning was 25 ± 6 min during TCI-PCA, compared with 19 ± 4 min during PCA (P = 0.022). Nausea occurred in 30% after TCI-PCA and 24% after PCA (P = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

TCI-PCA was effective and well tolerated in acute postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate this approach in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number: 2013-002875-16, and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02035709.

Для цитирования: Wehrfritz Andreas, Ihmsen Harald, Fuchte Tobias, Kim Michael, Kremer Sven, Weiß Alexander, Schüttler Jürgen, Jeleazcov Christian. Postoperative pain therapy with hydromorphone; comparison of patient-controlled analgesia with target-controlled infusion and standard patient-controlled analgesia: A randomised controlled trial.. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001360.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.