Acta cytologica · 1997
Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Halford J A, Wright R G, Ditchmen E J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the PAPNET Testing System and compare the sensitivity of this automated device with that of rapid rescreening.
STUDY DESIGN: In this study, 1,000 cervical smears previously diagnosed by our laboratory as negative were seeded with 20 particularly "difficult" cases. We submitted this seeded set of smears for rapid rescreening and to PAPNET to determine cases that could be detected by rapid rescreening, PAPNET or both.
RESULTS: Rapid rescreening detected 9 of the 20 cases (45%). The PAPNET system identified 19/20 (95%). This investigation found PAPNET rescreening to be more effective than rapid rescreening in detecting the seeded difficult cases.
CONCLUSION: Use of the PAPNET Testing System in tandem with rapid rescreening can reduce the rate of false negatives in diagnostically difficult cervical cytologic smears.
STUDY DESIGN: In this study, 1,000 cervical smears previously diagnosed by our laboratory as negative were seeded with 20 particularly "difficult" cases. We submitted this seeded set of smears for rapid rescreening and to PAPNET to determine cases that could be detected by rapid rescreening, PAPNET or both.
RESULTS: Rapid rescreening detected 9 of the 20 cases (45%). The PAPNET system identified 19/20 (95%). This investigation found PAPNET rescreening to be more effective than rapid rescreening in detecting the seeded difficult cases.
CONCLUSION: Use of the PAPNET Testing System in tandem with rapid rescreening can reduce the rate of false negatives in diagnostically difficult cervical cytologic smears.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AutomationFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMan-Machine SystemsMass ScreeningNeural Networks, ComputerPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ControlTumor Virus InfectionsUterine CervicitisVaginal SmearsVideo Recording