MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde · 2014

[Suspected allergy to a local anaesthetic: how often is allergy proven?].

Tupker Ron A, Fransen Marloes, van Zuuren Esther J

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the percentage of proven allergy for local anaesthetics (LA) in patients who were tested because of a clinical suspicion of LA allergy.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicentre case series.

METHOD: All patients from two hospitals who were seen from 2004 through 2013 for a possible allergy to local anaesthetics. Their records were analyzed for the probable type of allergic reaction and allergy tests were performed. Distinction was made between skin prick tests (SPT), intradermal tests (IDT), subcutaneous provocation tests and epicutaneous tests (patch tests).

RESULTS

53 patients were included. The most common symptoms were dizziness (n = 14) and collapse (n = 12). Urticaria, oedema and/or erythema were seen in 25 patients, whilst 2 patients had a drop in blood pressure. In 4 patients an IgE-mediated allergy was proven by means of provocation testing. SPT and IDT were not predictive. In 1 patient a delayed-type allergy was established by patch testing.

CONCLUSION

IgE-mediated and delayed-type allergic reactions are rarely caused by LA. IgE-mediated reactions can be proven by provocation testing. Patch testing is used when a delayed type reaction is suspected.

Для цитирования: Tupker Ron A, Fransen Marloes, van Zuuren Esther J. [Suspected allergy to a local anaesthetic: how often is allergy proven?].. Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde. 2014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.