MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32333-9

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 1994

Reduction cystoplasty in the prune belly syndrome: a long-term followup.

Bukowski T P, Perlmutter A D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The role of reduction cystoplasty in the management of severe prune belly syndrome is controversial. From 1973 to 1990, 11 boys with severe prune belly syndrome underwent comprehensive urinary tract reconstruction, including overlapping reduction cystoplasty. Followup ranged from 1.5 to 18 years and 6 boys are now older than 18 years. Nine had sepsis or progressive renal failure as neonates; 7 had upper tract diversion as an initial procedure, of whom 2 have chronic renal failure. Currently 9 boys are voiding, including 1 who could not void preoperatively, with less than 50 cc residual after double or triple voiding. One boy underwent transplantation to an ileal conduit and 1 continues on intermittent catheterization. In the 9 cases in which bladder volume data were available average reduction in volume at operation was 52%. At an average of 7.7 years later (range 1.5 to 14) bladder volumes corrected for age were essentially unchanged or greater than corrected preoperative volumes. Since reflux was corrected in 7 of 9 boys it cannot account for the redevelopment of large bladder capacities (range 740 to 2,300 cc). In cases of the prune belly syndrome reduction cystoplasty has helped to improve voiding and minimize infection during early childhood but it does not seem to decrease bladder capacity or improve voiding dynamics in the long-term.

Для цитирования: Bukowski T P, Perlmutter A D. Reduction cystoplasty in the prune belly syndrome: a long-term followup.. The Journal of urology. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32333-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.