Do heel-unloading orthoses improve clinical outcomes in patients after surgical treatment of calcaneal fracture? A propensity-matched, multicenter analysis of the TRON database.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative protocols after surgical treatment of calcaneal fracture have not been standardized to date. There are only a few reports on the efficacy of heel-unloading orthoses (HUOs; Mars shoe, Graffin orthosis), and thier efficacy is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative radiologic and clinical outcomes in patients with calcaneal fractures who used Graffin orthosis.

STUDY

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective study.

METHODS

We finally extracted 182 patients from a database of the Trauma Research Group of Nagoya and divided them into two groups: group C (underwent casting or splinting only) and group O (Graffin orthosis was used). A propensity score algorithm was used to match group C to group O in a 1:1 ratio. We evaluated American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at three and six months after surgery and at final follow-up. Differences in reduction of the Böhler angle between the two groups were evaluated radiographically. All data were analyzed with a t-test or Fisher's exact test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The AOFAS score 3 months after surgery in group O was significantly higher than that in group C (69.57 vs. 77.22; P = .004). However, there were no statistically significant differences between group C vs. group O in AOFAS scores at 6 months after surgery and at final follow-up (81.92 vs. 85.67 and 89.18 vs. 88.13; P = .087 and 0.597, respectively). There was no significant statistical difference in the reduction of the Böhler angle (5.07 vs. 5.89; P = .529).

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 months postoperatively, the orthosis group showed predominantly better functional results. We believe that heel-unloading orthoses are useful for patients who require an early return to work and to daily life.