DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107647
Grooming strategies in German Protestant contexts: A qualitative analysis of survivors' experiences.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Sexual abuse (SA) of minors is an ongoing global problem. Analyzing possible grooming strategies might help in the prevention of SA. Though SA of minors in religious institutions has been a major research topic, within Germany and worldwide, research regarding Protestant settings is scarce.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to analyze grooming strategies in German Protestant settings.
PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 persons who reported having experienced SA in a German Protestant setting.
METHODS
Qualitative content analysis was conducted, following a deductive-inductive approach.
RESULTS
Grooming strategies were sorted into nine main grooming categories with subcategories and one additional overarching category, marking the usage of religious concepts for grooming: (1) building a good reputation, (2) utilizing access to (vulnerable) persons, (3) creating opportunities for one-on-one contact, (4) isolating the child/adolescent, (5) building trust and dependencies, (6) desensitizing (slowly pushing boundaries), (7) directly preventing disclosure and (legal) consequences, (8) using power to enforce SA, (9) creating ambiguity.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study deepens the understanding of grooming in Christian contexts, offering a uniquely structured and detailed analysis of Protestant settings. Its thematic approach highlights important grooming strategies making them more tangible and recognizable across Germany and beyond. These insights provide valuable practical guidance for training church leaders, staff, parents, as well as children and adolescents, strengthening protective measures against abuse.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.