Anaerobe · 2026
1H NMR metabolomic profiling of Methanobacterium and Methanosarcina reveals unusual intracellular trimethylamine and acetamide production.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jabłoński Sławomir Jan, Mielko-Niziałek Karolina Anna, Mori Kai, Młynarz Piotr, Łukaszewicz Marcin Ziemowit
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Only a limited number of metabolomic datasets are available for pure cultures of methanogenic archaea, and none have reported 1H-NMR-based intracellular profiles for Methanobacterium and Methanosarcina. We aimed to characterize intracellular metabolite profiles in selected strains and to identify metabolites that challenge current metabolic models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine lyophilized biomass samples representing three Methanobacterium species and three Methanosarcina species (including M. acetivorans grown on methanol, acetate and trimethylamine) were analyzed as single biological samples. Intracellular metabolites were extracted with methanol/water and analyzed by 600 MHz 1H NMR. Spectra were processed using COW/icoshift alignment, PQN normalization and PCA.
RESULTS: Seventeen metabolites were identified across all samples, including amino acids, adenine nucleotides and small organic acids. PCA separated three metabolomic clusters corresponding to Methanobacterium, Methanosarcina (excluding M. acetivorans) and M. acetivorans grown on different substrates. Succinate and trimethylamine were detected only in Methanobacterium strains, whereas betaine and acetamide were restricted to M. acetivorans biomass. NAD(H) and pyruvate were not detected.
CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory data reveal unusual intracellular metabolites (trimethylamine, acetamide) not accounted for in current methanogenic pathways, suggesting missing reactions in existing metabolic models. The observed genus- and strain-specific metabolite fingerprints may support NMR-based identification of methanogens and motivate targeted studies on archaeal contributions to trimethylamine metabolism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine lyophilized biomass samples representing three Methanobacterium species and three Methanosarcina species (including M. acetivorans grown on methanol, acetate and trimethylamine) were analyzed as single biological samples. Intracellular metabolites were extracted with methanol/water and analyzed by 600 MHz 1H NMR. Spectra were processed using COW/icoshift alignment, PQN normalization and PCA.
RESULTS: Seventeen metabolites were identified across all samples, including amino acids, adenine nucleotides and small organic acids. PCA separated three metabolomic clusters corresponding to Methanobacterium, Methanosarcina (excluding M. acetivorans) and M. acetivorans grown on different substrates. Succinate and trimethylamine were detected only in Methanobacterium strains, whereas betaine and acetamide were restricted to M. acetivorans biomass. NAD(H) and pyruvate were not detected.
CONCLUSIONS: These exploratory data reveal unusual intracellular metabolites (trimethylamine, acetamide) not accounted for in current methanogenic pathways, suggesting missing reactions in existing metabolic models. The observed genus- and strain-specific metabolite fingerprints may support NMR-based identification of methanogens and motivate targeted studies on archaeal contributions to trimethylamine metabolism.