MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003897

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023

Cytology compared with Hybrid Capture 2 human papilloma virus cervical cancer screening in HIV positive and HIV negative South African women.

Snyman Leon Cornelius, Richter Karin Louise, Lukhwareni Azwidowi, Dreyer Gerrit, Botha Matthys Hendrik, Van Der Merwe F Haynes, Visser Cathy, Dreyer Greta

Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Cervical cancer is preventable and caused by persistent infection with oncogenic human papilloma virus (HPV) types. HPV screening is more sensitive and is the preferred screening test. HPV screening data are mainly from developed settings, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of HPV screening in previously unscreened HIV positive and negative women.

METHODS

In this cross sectional multicenter study, liquid based cytology and HPV testing were performed on women attending different clinics. Patients with positive screening tests had colposcopy and biopsy or large loop excision of the transformation zone. Some women with normal screening had colposcopy and biopsy. Data of women with histology results, and data of HIV positive and negative women were analyzed for comparison. For women without histology results, data were imputed using a statistical model.

RESULTS

In 903 women with known HIV status, 683 (75.6%) had negative cytology, 202 women (22.4%) had abnormal cytology, and in 18 patients (2.0%) the results were uncertain. Mean age was 41.4 years (range 25-65). HPV tests were negative in 621 women (68.8%). In HIV positive women, 54.5% tested negative compared with 79.7% HIV negative women (p<0.0001). HPV screening had higher sensitivity (60.9%), but lower specificity (82.4%), compared with cytology (48.6% and 86.7%) for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ in all women. For detection of CIN 3+, HPV screening had higher sensitivity (70.4%) compared with cytology (62.9%), and specificity (75.5%) was lower compared with cytology at a threshold of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS+) (82.4%).

CONCLUSION

HPV screening was more sensitive than cytology in HIV positive and HIV negative women, but specificity was lower. Although HPV screening should be the preferred screening test, cytology is a suitable screening test in HIV positive women in low resource settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02956031.

Для цитирования: Snyman Leon Cornelius, Richter Karin Louise, Lukhwareni Azwidowi, Dreyer Gerrit, Botha Matthys Hendrik, Van Der Merwe F Haynes, Visser Cathy, Dreyer Greta. Cytology compared with Hybrid Capture 2 human papilloma virus cervical cancer screening in HIV positive and HIV negative South African women.. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society. 2023. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003897.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.