Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2020
Reconstruction of the Orbit and Anophthalmic Socket Using the Dermis Fat Graft: A Major Review.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jovanovic Nina, Carniciu Anaïs L, Russell William W, Jarocki Adrienne, Kahana Alon
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive review of dermis fat graft (DFG) in socket reconstruction and illustrate the technical nuances and outcomes using a retrospective case review.
METHODS: A literature search of 143 texts was reviewed. A retrospective case series of 34 patients following primary or secondary DFG after enucleation at a single institution (2009-2019) was performed. Clinical outcomes were statistically analyzed. Variables investigated included age, sex, race, surgical indication, muscle reattachment, complications, motility, eyelid position, prosthesis fit, and need for additional surgery.
RESULTS: The history of DFG, use in socket reconstruction, primary and secondary indications, and surgical techniques are described. Thirty-two adults and 2 pediatric cases of DFG were reviewed; 18.75% indications were primary and 81.25% were secondary. Good eyelid position was observed in 83.3% of patients with primary DFG versus 37.5% with secondary DFG (p = 0.07). Postoperative complications occurred in 58.8% of patients, were typically mild, and resolved with minimal or no intervention. No statistically significant differences were found between occurrence of any particular complication in primary versus secondary DFG placement (p = 0.36) or between primary and secondary DFG placement and the need for additional surgery (p = 1.0). Among the 67.7% patients who had implant exposure or extrusion as an indication for DFG, 39.1% required additional surgery within 2 years. Advanced age was not associated with higher complication rates (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: DFG is an excellent option for socket reconstruction, particularly in cases involving pediatric patients, complicated orbits, history of multiple previous surgeries, and inflamed, contracted, or scarred sockets.
METHODS: A literature search of 143 texts was reviewed. A retrospective case series of 34 patients following primary or secondary DFG after enucleation at a single institution (2009-2019) was performed. Clinical outcomes were statistically analyzed. Variables investigated included age, sex, race, surgical indication, muscle reattachment, complications, motility, eyelid position, prosthesis fit, and need for additional surgery.
RESULTS: The history of DFG, use in socket reconstruction, primary and secondary indications, and surgical techniques are described. Thirty-two adults and 2 pediatric cases of DFG were reviewed; 18.75% indications were primary and 81.25% were secondary. Good eyelid position was observed in 83.3% of patients with primary DFG versus 37.5% with secondary DFG (p = 0.07). Postoperative complications occurred in 58.8% of patients, were typically mild, and resolved with minimal or no intervention. No statistically significant differences were found between occurrence of any particular complication in primary versus secondary DFG placement (p = 0.36) or between primary and secondary DFG placement and the need for additional surgery (p = 1.0). Among the 67.7% patients who had implant exposure or extrusion as an indication for DFG, 39.1% required additional surgery within 2 years. Advanced age was not associated with higher complication rates (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: DFG is an excellent option for socket reconstruction, particularly in cases involving pediatric patients, complicated orbits, history of multiple previous surgeries, and inflamed, contracted, or scarred sockets.