PloS one · 2026
Assessing the appropriateness of helicopter emergency medical services for non-traumatic emergencies in a medically underserved rural area, Japan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsubara Shohei, Sada Ken-Ei, Kudo Masataka, Sasaki Sho, Morizane Atsushi, Kajihara Koshi, Okubo Hidenao, Hamagawa Kosuke, Mizobuchi Toshimi, Yabe Toshikazu, Saisaka Yuichi, Tanaka Kimiaki, Suganuma Narufumi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) are essential in trauma care, but their role in non-traumatic emergencies remains unclear, particularly in medically underserved rural areas where long total prehospital times and limited specialty care access complicate emergency response.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the appropriateness of HEMS dispatches in non-trauma emergencies by assessing undertriage and overtriage based on clinical necessity and total prehospital time in rural western Kochi Prefecture, Japan.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) requiring emergency transport for moderate to severe non-traumatic conditions during HEMS operational hours from 2017 to 2021. HEMS necessity was classified as "absolute" (treatment unavailable at local core hospitals) or "relative" (critical condition benefiting from shorter transport). Appropriateness was defined as concordance between actual transport modality and predefined necessity criteria, with undertriage and overtriage determined by comparing the actual primary HEMS dispatch requests against these criteria and regional total prehospital times.
RESULTS: Of the 2,312 eligible patients, 63 received primary HEMS dispatches and 2,249 ground EMS (GEMS). Among HEMS dispatches, 56 of 63 (88.9%) were overtriaged, while seven (11.1%) were appropriately triaged. Among GEMS transports, 248 of 2,249 (11.0%) retrospectively met HEMS criteria, yielding an 11.0% undertriage rate. Overtriaged cases included patients lacking relative necessity criteria or total prehospital time advantage.
CONCLUSIONS: In medically underserved rural regions, clinical severity alone may be insufficient for determining HEMS necessity in non-traumatic emergencies. Incorporating total prehospital time advantage and regional infrastructure consideration may refine dispatch decision-making and improve HEMS utilization appropriateness.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the appropriateness of HEMS dispatches in non-trauma emergencies by assessing undertriage and overtriage based on clinical necessity and total prehospital time in rural western Kochi Prefecture, Japan.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) requiring emergency transport for moderate to severe non-traumatic conditions during HEMS operational hours from 2017 to 2021. HEMS necessity was classified as "absolute" (treatment unavailable at local core hospitals) or "relative" (critical condition benefiting from shorter transport). Appropriateness was defined as concordance between actual transport modality and predefined necessity criteria, with undertriage and overtriage determined by comparing the actual primary HEMS dispatch requests against these criteria and regional total prehospital times.
RESULTS: Of the 2,312 eligible patients, 63 received primary HEMS dispatches and 2,249 ground EMS (GEMS). Among HEMS dispatches, 56 of 63 (88.9%) were overtriaged, while seven (11.1%) were appropriately triaged. Among GEMS transports, 248 of 2,249 (11.0%) retrospectively met HEMS criteria, yielding an 11.0% undertriage rate. Overtriaged cases included patients lacking relative necessity criteria or total prehospital time advantage.
CONCLUSIONS: In medically underserved rural regions, clinical severity alone may be insufficient for determining HEMS necessity in non-traumatic emergencies. Incorporating total prehospital time advantage and regional infrastructure consideration may refine dispatch decision-making and improve HEMS utilization appropriateness.