DOI 10.1007/s00405-025-09856-1
Cautionary lessons from real-world testing of GPT-4.1 AI for pediatric foreign body aspiration.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of a multimodal large language model (GPT-4.1) in detecting pediatric airway foreign body aspiration (FBA) using real-world clinical and radiographic data.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included 58 pediatric patients evaluated for suspected airway FBA at a tertiary academic hospital between 2015 and 2024. Each case combined structured clinical data and chest radiographs obtained at the time of emergency-department presentation, with bronchoscopy serving as the diagnostic reference standard. GPT-4.1, a vision-enabled large language model, classified cases as right-bronchus aspiration, left-bronchus aspiration, or no aspiration. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.
RESULTS
The model achieved an overall accuracy of 62.3%, with precision of 23.3%, recall of 19.0%, and an F1-score of 0.21. While it correctly identified 34 of 46 cases without aspiration, it detected only 4 of 12 confirmed bronchial-aspiration cases and missed all left-bronchus aspirations.
CONCLUSIONS
This proof-of-concept feasibility study highlights substantial limitations of a general-purpose multimodal AI model in pediatric airway triage. The low recall and high misclassification rates suggest that vision-enabled language models require task-specific training and rigorous validation before clinical implementation. Nevertheless, when used as an adjunct rather than a replacement for bronchoscopy, such models may eventually support triage decisions in resource-limited settings if further optimized and prospectively validated.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.