MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.141

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2007

Reconstruction of the female urethra: versatility, complexity and aptness.

Wadie Bassem S, Elhifnawy Ahmed, Khair Albair A

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Female urethral anomalies, whether congenital or acquired, are rare. Urethral defects are usually if not always associated with variable degrees of incontinence. In this case series we demonstrate the approach in management and surgical outcome of congenital and traumatic urethral anomalies.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The study was conducted on 13 patients with an age range of 2 to 38 years (median 20). Of these patients 4 had female epispadias, 1 had hypospadias, 3 had traumatic urethral loss and 2 had iatrogenic trauma involving the urethra. There were 2 patients with urogenital sinus syndrome and 1 patient had urethral prolapse.

RESULTS

After the first stage of repair 4 patients were dry and socially satisfied, and no further intervention was needed. However, in 9 patients a second intervention was necessary to achieve continence. Notably 3 patients empty the bladder through clean intermittent catheterization.

CONCLUSIONS

Female urethral defects are usually complex. Congenital causes are associated with severe incontinence. Repair of such defects is challenging, yet 1-stage reconstruction is feasible and potentially successful.

Для цитирования: Wadie Bassem S, Elhifnawy Ahmed, Khair Albair A. Reconstruction of the female urethra: versatility, complexity and aptness.. The Journal of urology. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.141.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.