MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/2013.7.focus13260

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgical focus · 2013

Orthotic (helmet) therapy in the treatment of plagiocephaly.

Goh Jo Ling, Bauer David F, Durham Susan R, Stotland Mitchell A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to review the current literature on orthotic (helmet) therapy use in the treatment of deformational plagiocephaly.

METHODS

PubMed was used to search English articles using the medical subject headings "deformational plagiocephaly" and "orthosis," and "deformational plagiocephaly" and "helmet."

RESULTS

Forty-two articles were found. There were no Class I studies, 7 Class II studies, 1 Class III study, and 13 Class IV studies. Cranial orthoses have been shown to be effective in treating deformational plagiocephaly. It continues to be debated as to whether the statistical significance of treatment with cranial orthoses compared with conservative therapies is clinically significant. Children older than 12 months of age with deformational plagiocephaly may still benefit from orthotic therapy. The long-term effects of orthotic therapy are controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of Class I literature evidence supporting the use of helmet therapy in deformational plagiocephaly. There are controversies surrounding the use of orthotic therapy such as appropriate use, cost, use in older children, and long-term outcomes. Clinical indications for orthotic therapy need to be better defined with further research studies.

Для цитирования: Goh Jo Ling, Bauer David F, Durham Susan R, Stotland Mitchell A. Orthotic (helmet) therapy in the treatment of plagiocephaly.. Neurosurgical focus. 2013. DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.focus13260.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.