MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90416-6

Медицинская библиотека · Brain research · 1986

Acetylcholine-induced hyperpolarization in identified neurones of the African giant snail (Achatina fulica Férussac).

Furukawa Y, Kobayashi M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Three types of hyperpolarization in response to applied acetylcholine (ACh) were observed in 4 identified neurones (RP1, RP2, RP3 and RP4) in the right parietal ganglion of the African giant snail, Achatina fulica Férussac. In order to clarify the ionic mechanisms of these responses, the neurones were voltage-clamped using two microelectrodes and the reversal potential of the ACh-induced currents was measured under several external ionic environments. Experiments revealed the existence of two different ACh-induced currents (Cl- and K+). It was concluded that the 3 types of hyperpolarizing responses were due to the relative sizes of the two currents in a neurone. Effects of some cholinergic antagonists on these currents were studied. Benzoquinonium blocked both currents at nearly the same concentration. D-Tubocurarine, decamethonium and atropine blocked Cl- current but not K+ current. These drugs did not show any clear voltage-dependency on their blocking actions. Tetraethylammonium blocked the ACh-induced K+ current at a lower concentration than that needed to block the other K+ channels in molluscan neurones, but it had little effect on Cl- current. These results suggest that two currents may be mediated by different ACh receptors.

Для цитирования: Furukawa Y, Kobayashi M. Acetylcholine-induced hyperpolarization in identified neurones of the African giant snail (Achatina fulica Férussac).. Brain research. 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90416-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.