MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/curroncol33020078

Медицинская библиотека · Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026

Optimizing Antiemetic Strategies Across Phases of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Real-World Evidence in Breast Cancer.

Doğan Akif, Erölmez Hande Nur, Akdağ Goncagül, Yıldırım Sedat, Sever Özlem Nuray

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains one of the significant challenges in oncology despite guideline-based prophylaxis, particularly in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). While neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonists are established as a key component of standard antiemetic regimens, evidence of their phase-specific effectiveness in real-world, homogeneous patient populations remains limited. This study aimed to determine which antiemetic regimen provides optimal control in each CINV phase to support a tailored prophylactic approach.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, real-world study included 260 female patients with stage II-III breast cancer receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide-based HEC. All patients had similar demographic and clinical characteristics, forming a relatively homogeneous cohort. Each received a triple antiemetic regimen consisting of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and an NK-1 receptor antagonist (either a single-dose intravenous fosaprepitant or a 3-day oral aprepitant). Complete response (no vomiting and no rescue therapy) and no-vomiting rates were assessed in the acute (0-24 h), delayed (24-120 h), and overall (0-120 h) phases.

RESULTS

In this relatively homogeneous cohort of high-risk patients, fosaprepitant-based prophylaxis achieved better symptom control during the acute phase, whereas aprepitant-based regimens were more effective in the delayed and overall phases. These findings suggest phase-specific variations in antiemetic effectiveness that reflect pharmacokinetic and administration-route differences rather than population heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis demonstrates that antiemetic effectiveness varies by CINV phase, even within a relatively homogeneous, high-risk patient cohort. The results highlight the importance of phase-tailored prophylactic strategies to optimize symptom control and improve patient quality of life in highly emetogenic chemotherapy settings.

Для цитирования: Doğan Akif, Erölmez Hande Nur, Akdağ Goncagül, Yıldırım Sedat, Sever Özlem Nuray. Optimizing Antiemetic Strategies Across Phases of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Real-World Evidence in Breast Cancer.. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.). 2026. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol33020078.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.